|

|
"Electronic hypertext, the latest extension of
writing, raises many questions and problems about culture,
power, and the individual, but is is no more (or less)
natural than any other form of writing, which is the greatest
as well as the most destructive of all technologies" (
George Landow, Hypertext, 1992) |
|
As the internet is revolutionising all areas of commerce and communications,
it also has major implications in the area of the humanities. Considerable
research is being done which investigates changes in peoples' reading
and perceptual patterns.
George Landow's study Hypertext proposes that hypertext realises what
Barthes and other major literary theorists hailed as the truest form
of literature - that which is most free from the controlling hand of
the author. The omnipresent and all-knowing narrator is never matched
in real life: so, they propose, literature which gives value to a
central and controlling consciousness is exercising some form of ideological control or pretense.
'In S/Z, Roland Barthes describes an ideal textuality that precisely matches
that which has come to be called computer hypertext - text composed of blocks of words
(or images) linked electronically by multiple paths, chains, or trails in an
open-ended, perpetually unfinished textuality described by the terms link,
node, network, web , and path: 'In this ideal text,' says Barthes, 'the
networks are many and interact, without any of them being able to surpass the rest;
this text is a galaxy of signifiers, not a structure of signifieds; it has no
beginning; it is reversible; we gain access to it by several entrances, none of which
can be authoritatively declared to be the main one; the codes it mobilises extend , they are indeterminable. . . ; the systems of meaning
can take over this absolutely plural text, but their number is never closed, based as
it is on the infinity of language'(emphasis in the original). (Extract from , George
Landow, Hopkins University Press,1992, p3)
Hypertext allows such a level of interaction and decision by the reader
that their integration into text is at its peak.
Since 1990, the
CTI Centre for Textual Studies, based at the University
of Oxford, has promoted the use of Information Technology
in a range of subjects, which collectively and broadly
can be defined as 'textual studies'. They support the use
of computers in the teaching of literature (all languages),
literary linguistics, theology, classics, philosophy,
film and media studies, theatre, arts and drama.
On 10 October 1998, I attended a Conference hosted by
The Open University, called HumanITies:
Information Technology in the Arts and Humanities: Present
Applications and Future Perspectives. A wide variety
of papers were given on various projects running in this
area. To mention a few:
(i) The JSTOR scheme - a scheme
which is facilitating electronic access to core scholarly
journals. Over 2 million pages have been put into the
collection of older journal material - some of which were
first published in the 1880s.
(ii) Case studies of various tools - Electronic
Workshops, Interactive Photo CDs, Electronic Tutoring, etc.
(iii) One interesting paper dealt with an initiative
in computer mediated communication and the teaching of
English Literature. Participants included pupils from
2 comprehensive schools, teachers, and members of a University
Department of Education. One aim of the project is to pair
boys from each of the two schools (from geographically
and socially diverse backgrounds) as email partners and to
see whether, by encouraging them to share their responses
to the novel under study (Animal Farm), it is possible
to improve their reading skills and to enhance their
enjoyment of literature. Email, the project leaders pointed
out, can be a comparatively anonymous form of communication
in that its messages come free of such personal markers
as accent, handwriting or status: this presents exciting
possibilities for teachers of literature.
(iv) One of the most stimulating papers was that given
by one of the leading academics in the area -
Willard McCarty. of the Centre For Computing
in the Humanities. Willard argues that in recent years computing
has become essential to carrying out most if not all the mechanical tasks
of scholarship. Leading scholars are arguing that the intellectual
consequences of applying the computer to research in the humanities
are changing the sociology of knowledge. Some have speculated and even
begun to demonstrate that computing alters what we regard as knowledge
and both through its powers and limitations brings new questions to
light. Go to the paper given at the conference, Poem and Algorithm:
Humanities Computing in the life and place of the mind. Another
interesting paper which defines Humanities Computing:
What is Humanities
Computing?
|
�
|